SB 37’s complaint process, as we read the statute, runs in four steps: a complaint served on the advertiser starts a 9-day window to withdraw the advertisement voluntarily; the advertiser must provide the advertisement to the State Bar within 7 days; a State Bar attorney then has 21 days from delivery to decide whether substantial evidence of a violation exists; and after such a finding, an electronic advertisement can be withdrawn within 72 hours. The statutory damages figures quoted everywhere, $5,000 to $100,000 per unique advertisement, become available to a misled consumer only after all of those prerequisites and a failure to withdraw as provided, or a later rebroadcast. This article walks the sequence. It is marketing-compliance information, not legal advice.
nn
Who can start it
n
The complaint process is open to any person. That includes a former client, a competitor, and a stranger who noticed a guarantee on a practice-area page. Nothing in the statute requires the complainant to have been harmed to file; harm becomes relevant later, when remedies are in question.
nn
Clock one: 9 days after personal service
n
Once a complaint is personally served on the advertiser, a 9-day voluntary-withdrawal window opens. Withdrawing the advertisement within that window is the statute’s designed off-ramp. For a firm, the practical question is speed: does anyone know, within a day, every place the challenged advertisement appears, including the agency-managed posts and the ad creatives still running in the public ad libraries? A current inventory of live advertising is what turns a 9-day window into a usable one.
nn
Clock two: 7 days to deliver the advertisement
n
The advertiser must provide the advertisement to the State Bar within 7 days. This matters because the next clock runs from delivery, not from service. Slow delivery does not buy time; it delays the review while the challenged content is still live.
nn
Clock three: 21 days for the State Bar attorney
n
After the advertisement is delivered, a State Bar attorney has 21 days to determine whether substantial evidence of a violation exists. The standard is substantial evidence, not proof, and the determination is the pivot of the whole process: nothing about damages is possible before it, and the 72-hour clock only exists after it.
nn
Clock four: 72 hours to take down electronic advertising
n
After a substantial-evidence determination, an electronic advertisement can be withdrawn within 72 hours. Websites, social posts and online ads are electronic media by definition. Seventy-two hours is enough time for a firm that knows where its advertising lives and who controls each account. It is not enough time to discover, for the first time, that a vendor from two years ago still runs a landing page.
nn
Where the money comes in
n
Section 6157.2(c) permits a consumer who was misled by a violating advertisement to seek specified remedies, but only after the prescribed complaint, the State Bar’s substantial-evidence determination, and the advertiser’s failure to withdraw as provided, or a later rebroadcast of the advertisement. Statutory damages may range from $5,000 to $100,000 per unique advertisement, or three times actual damages, whichever is larger. Two points deserve emphasis. First, these remedies sit at the end of the sequence, not the beginning; the widely quoted numbers are not a fine for having a non-compliant page. Second, whether individual website pages are separate unique advertisements is not settled, so “three pages, three times the minimum” is arithmetic for illustration, not a prediction. Discipline under the Rules of Professional Conduct is a separate track and remains possible regardless.
nn
What this means for how a firm prepares
n
- n
- Know what is live. An inventory of every page, profile, post and paid creative, with who controls it, is the single most useful preparation. Every clock above is a clock against finding things.
- Review before publication. A documented review of advertising against the published rules, routed to the responsible attorney for approval, is a control. It is not a certification and not a guaranteed defense, but it is the record a firm would want to have.
- Re-check after changes. New pages, new posts and new ads change the advertising record. A periodic re-scan against a known baseline identifies changed material for review.
- Involve counsel early. The determination of how the prerequisites, the term “unique advertisement,” and the remedies apply to a specific firm belongs to its responsible attorney and ethics counsel.
n
n
n
n
nn
The sequence, in one table
n
| Step | Clock | Runs from | What it means for the firm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voluntary withdrawal | 9 days | Personal service of the complaint | Take the advertisement down everywhere it appears |
| Deliver the advertisement | 7 days | Service | Provide the advertisement to the State Bar; the next clock starts on delivery |
| State Bar review | 21 days | Delivery to the State Bar | A State Bar attorney decides whether substantial evidence of a violation exists |
| Electronic take-down | 72 hours | Substantial-evidence determination | Withdraw electronic advertisements |
| Consumer remedies | — | After all prerequisites and a failure to withdraw, or a rebroadcast | $5,000–$100,000 per unique advertisement, or three times actual damages, whichever is larger |
n
Sources: California Business and Professions Code §6157.2 as amended by SB 37 (effective January 1, 2026), including subdivision (c); §§6158–6158.3 (electronic media). Lawthentics Limited is a marketing agency, not a law firm. This article describes the published statute as we read it for review purposes; it is not legal advice, and how the process applies to a specific firm is a question for its responsible attorney and ethics counsel.